Skip to content

Use Cases & User Stories

Comprehensive use case catalog for CostEngine (MfgIQ).


Summary Table

ID Use Case Name Category Priority Complexity User Role
UC-001 Complete RFQ-to-Quote Flow Core Workflow P0 - Critical High Estimator
UC-002 Rush Quote (High Priority) Core Workflow P0 - Critical Medium Estimator
UC-101 Import Standard Costing Template Excel Import P0 - Critical Medium Estimator
UC-102 Import with Errors Excel Import P1 - Important Medium Estimator
UC-103 Import Legacy Excel (Non-Standard) Excel Import P1 - Important High Estimator
UC-104 Similar Part Geometry Search Excel Import P1 - Important High Estimator
UC-201 Calculate Material Cost Cost Calculation P0 - Critical Low System
UC-202 Calculate Multi-Operation Cost Cost Calculation P0 - Critical Medium System
UC-203 Apply Cascading Scrap Cost Calculation P0 - Critical Medium System
UC-301 Drill Down on Cost Line Explainability P0 - Critical Medium Estimator
UC-302 Compare Two Versions Explainability P1 - Important Medium Estimator
UC-303 Benchmark against History Explainability P1 - Important Medium Estimator
UC-304 Low-Margin Approval Workflow Explainability P0 - Critical Medium Manager
UC-401 Customer Requests Quantity Change Versioning P1 - Important Low Estimator
UC-402 Material Price Increase Versioning P1 - Important Medium Admin
UC-501 Generate Standard Quote Output P0 - Critical Medium Estimator
UC-502 Quote for Tender Submission Output P1 - Important Low Estimator
UC-601 Missing Critical Data UI & Data Integrity P1 - Important Low System
UC-602 Unrealistic Values UI & Data Integrity P1 - Important Medium System
UC-603 UI Validation Patterns UX/UI Hygiene P1 - Important Low UI Layer
UC-701 Sync with Tally ERP Integration P2 - Future High Admin
UC-702 Email Integration Integration P2 - Future Low Estimator
UC-801 Incremental Excel Sync Data Pipeline P0 - Critical High System
UC-802 Automated Rate Lock Data Pipeline P1 - Important Medium System
UC-901 Database Failover Recovery System Ops P1 - Important High DevOps
UC-902 Audit Trail Forensic Search System Ops P1 - Important Medium Admin
UC-903 Containerized Deployment (Docker) Technical Ops P1 - Important Medium DevOps
UC-904 Centralized Observability & Logging Technical Ops P1 - Important Low Admin
UC-905 MLOps Pipeline (Phase 3) Intelligence P2 - Future High System

Total Use Cases: 30 covering all MVP & Intelligence functionality


Core Workflow Use Cases

UC-001: Complete RFQ-to-Quote Flow

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: High
Actor: Estimator

Precondition: Customer sent RFQ via email with part drawings and quantity

Main Success Scenario:

Step Action Expected Result
1 Estimator uploads Excel costing template with RFQ details File uploaded successfully
2 System extracts material specs, BOM, and routing Data parsed and displayed
3 System calculates costs automatically All cost components calculated
4 Estimator reviews cost breakdown Cost details visible with explainability
5 Estimator overrides cycle time based on shop floor expertise Override accepted, impact shown
6 System recalculates and shows impact Updated costs displayed
7 Estimator generates quote with 3 margin scenarios Quote previewed
8 System creates PDF and Excel quote pack Files generated
9 Estimator sends quote to customer Quote sent
10 System saves version 1.0 Version saved with timestamp

Alternative Flows:

Flow ID Condition Action
3a Missing material rate System prompts for manual entry
4a Cost seems too high Estimator investigates assumptions
6a Override rejected Estimator must provide reason

Postcondition: Quote sent to customer, version saved in system

Performance Target: 15-20 minutes (vs 2-4 hours manually)

Acceptance Criteria: - Complete flow in < 20 minutes - All 6 cost components calculated - At least 1 override applied successfully - PDF + Excel quote generated


UC-002: Rush Quote (High Priority)

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Estimator

Business Context: Customer needs quote in 1 hour for urgent project

Flow:

Step Action Time Target
1 Estimator uses existing similar part as template 5 min
2 Adjusts quantity and critical dimensions 10 min
3 Accepts default assumptions (no deep validation) 5 min
4 Generates Base margin scenario only 5 min
5 Sends quote within 30 minutes 5 min

Key Requirements:

Requirement Supported Notes
Fast template duplication Yes Copy from existing quote
Quick overrides without full validation Yes Skip validation checks
Single margin scenario option Yes Base margin only

Excel Import Use Cases

UC-101: Import Standard Costing Template

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Estimator

Precondition: Estimator has filled Excel template with part data

Flow:

Step Action System Response
1 Click "Upload Costing Sheet" File dialog opens
2 Select Excel file from computer File uploading...
3 System validates file structure Validation in progress
4 System extracts and displays data Shows Part number, drawing number, Material grade and specs, Operations list with times, Tooling requirements
5 System highlights any missing fields Warning indicators shown
6 Estimator confirms import Processing...
7 System creates quote draft Quote draft created

Success Criteria:

Criterion Target Measurement
Data field mapping 100% All fields mapped correctly
Missing field warnings All Warnings shown for empty fields
Import time < 10 sec From upload to draft creation

UC-102: Import with Errors

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Estimator

Flow:

Step Action Error Detected
1 Upload Excel file Processing...
2 System detects errors Unknown material grade "XYZ123"
2a Missing cycle time for Operation 3
2b Negative scrap percentage
3 System shows error report with line numbers Error details with cell references
4 Estimator fixes issues in Excel File updated
5 Re-uploads corrected file Validation passed
6 Import succeeds Quote draft created

Error Handling:

Feature Supported Details
Clear error messages with cell references Yes Shows exact Excel cell
Partial import option (skip errored rows) Yes Import valid data only
Downloadable error log Yes CSV export of errors

UC-103: Import Legacy Excel (Non-Standard Format)

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: High
Actor: Estimator

Scenario: Factory has been using Excel for 10 years, custom format

Flow:

Step Action Result
1 Upload custom Excel Attempt auto-detection
2 System attempts auto-detection Fails - format unknown
3 Estimator selects "Manual Field Mapping" mode Mapping UI opens
4 System shows Excel preview First 10 rows displayed
5 Estimator maps fields "Item Code" → Part Number
"Material Type" → Material Grade
"Time per Piece (min)" → Cycle Time
6 System saves mapping template Template saved
7 Future uploads use saved mapping Auto-applied

Key Feature: Excel-first onboarding (differentiation!)


Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: High
Actor: Estimator

Scenario: User uploads a part with a new Part Number (e.g., "AX-505"), but the factory has made a similar "Shaft" before.

Flow: 1. Upload: Estimator uploads part details. 2. Geometric Hashing: System analyzes critical dimensions (Diameter, Length, Material). 3. Similarity Detect: System identifies Part #AX-102 as a 90% geometric match. 4. Context Suggestion: Sidebar shows: "Found similar part AX-102. Usual quote: ₹1,100. Should I import its Routing logic?" 5. Selection: Estimator accepts suggeston to save 15 minutes of data entry.


Cost Calculation Use Cases

UC-201: Calculate Material Cost

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Low
Actor: System (automated)

Trigger: Material data imported

Calculation Steps:

Step Action Value Source
1 Get material grade SAE4140 Excel import
2 Look up current RM rate ₹99.5/kg Material Master (updated 2026-01-20)
3 Get gross weight 2.304 kg Excel (per drawing)
4 Get net weight 2.0 kg Excel (finished part)
5 Calculate yield 86.8% 2.0 / 2.304
6 Apply formula ₹263.95 (2.304 × 99.5) / 0.868
7 Save to cost breakdown with assumption tags Saved With full traceability

Explainability Output:

Material Cost: ₹263.95
├─ Material: SAE4140 (from Excel)
├─ RM Rate: ₹99.5/kg (current market rate, last updated 2026-01-20)
├─ Gross Weight: 2.304 kg (per drawing)
├─ Net Weight: 2.0 kg (finished part)
├─ Yield: 86.8% (calculated)
└─ Formula: (2.304 × 99.5) / 0.868

Formula: $$ \text{Material Cost} = \frac{\text{Gross Weight} \times \text{RM Rate}}{\text{Yield}} $$


UC-202: Calculate Multi-Operation Cost

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Medium
Actor: System

Input: Routing with 5 operations

Calculation Breakdown:

Operation Setup Cost Cycle Cost Tool Cost Total Calculation
Op 1: Cutting ₹0.07 ₹14.40 ₹0.00 ₹14.47 Setup: 0.30h @ ₹120/h ÷ 500pcs
Cycle: 0.12h @ ₹120/h
Op 2: Turning ₹0.05 ₹72.00 ₹0.00 ₹72.05 Setup: 0.20h @ ₹120/h ÷ 500pcs
Cycle: 0.60h @ ₹120/h
Op 3: Threading ₹0.08 ₹137.20 ₹2.00 ₹139.28 Setup: 0.30h @ ₹140/h ÷ 500pcs
Cycle: 0.98h @ ₹140/h
Tool: ₹2.00/pc
Op 4: Heat Treat ₹0.04 ₹8.00 ₹0.00 ₹8.04 Setup: 0.10h @ ₹100/h ÷ 500pcs
Cycle: 0.08h @ ₹100/h
Op 5: Coating ₹0.06 ₹4.55 ₹0.00 ₹4.61 Setup: 0.15h @ ₹80/h ÷ 500pcs
Cycle: 0.06h @ ₹80/h
Total ₹0.30 ₹236.15 ₹2.00 ₹238.45

Key Feature: Operations-first model (differentiation!)


UC-203: Apply Cascading Scrap

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Medium
Actor: System

Scenario: Need 1000 finished pieces, scrap at each stage

Cascading Calculation:

Stage Scrap % Required Qty Calculation
Final Output - 1000 pcs Target quantity
Material Stage 5% 1053 pcs 1000 / 0.95
Operation 1 3% 1085 pcs 1053 / 0.97
Operation 2 2% 1107 pcs 1085 / 0.98
Raw Material Start - 1107 pcs +10.7% total

Cost Impact:

Component Impact Notes
Material cost +10.7% Purchase 1107 instead of 1000
Tracked in explainability Yes Full scrap traceability

Explainability Use Cases

UC-301: Drill Down on Cost Line

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Estimator

Scenario: Customer questions why material cost is ₹264

Flow:

Step Action Display
1 Estimator clicks on "Material Cost: ₹263.95" Cost line highlighted
2 System shows popup Material Cost Breakdown

Source Data:
✓ Material Grade: SAE4140 (from Excel cell B7)
✓ Gross Weight: 2.304 kg (from Excel cell D13)
✓ RM Rate: ₹99.5/kg (from Material Master)

Calculation:
(Gross Weight × RM Rate) / Yield %
= (2.304 × 99.5) / 0.868
= ₹263.95

Assumptions:
• Yield: 86.8% (calculated from gross/net)
• RM Rate: Current market rate (updated 2026-01-20)
• No scrap surcharge applied

[Override RM Rate] [Override Yield %]
3 Estimator screenshots this for customer Screenshot taken
4 Customer satisfied with transparency Accepted

Key Feature: Explainable + defensible (differentiation!)


UC-302: Compare Two Versions

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Estimator

Scenario: Customer asks "Why did quote go up from v1.0 to v1.1?"

Flow:

Step Action Result
1 Open quote, select "Compare Versions" Version selector shown
2 Choose v1.0 vs v1.1 Loading comparison...
3 System shows diff Detailed changes displayed
4 Estimator forwards comparison to customer with context Email sent

Diff Display:

Cost Component v1.0 v1.1 Change Reason
Material Cost ₹229.22 ₹263.95 +₹34.73 (+15.1%) RM Rate: ₹89.5/kg → ₹99.5/kg
"RM price increase from supplier"
Op 3: Threading ₹125.00 ₹139.28 +₹14.28 (+11.4%) Cycle: 0.85h → 0.98h
"Revised time after trial run"
Total Impact +₹49.01 (+9.3%)

UC-303: Benchmark against History

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Estimator

Scenario: Estimator identifies a new "Cost to Quote" of ₹950, but remembers charging ₹1,100 previously.

Main Success Scenario:

Step Action System Response
1 Estimator begins costing for Part #AX-102 System identifies historical quotes for the same or similar part number.
2 System displays "History Sidebar" Shows: "Last Quoted: ₹1,100 (v2.0, 2025-11-15)".
3 Estimator completes the 950 estimate System calculates variance: -₹150 (-13.6%).
4 System highlights "Significant Variance Detected" UI shows a comparison bar: [Historical: 1,100] vs [Current: 950].
5 Estimator clicks "Analyze Variance" System pulls price-buildup from both versions to highlight delta (e.g., "Steel Rate was ₹110, now ₹98").
6 Estimator confirms the new price as defensible Variance note saved to audit log.

Key Feature: Prevents "Price Drift" by surfacing historical context during active estimation.


UC-304: Low-Margin Approval Workflow

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Manager

Scenario: Estimator sets price to ₹950 (8% margin), which is below the "Aggressive" floor of 15%.

Flow: 1. Floor Check: System flags the 8% margin as "High Risk". 2. Restriction: "Publish Quote" button is disabled. 3. Request: Estimator clicks "Request Approval" and adds note: "Matching competitor price for strategic entry." 4. Notification: Sales Manager receives an app/email alert. 5. Action: Manager reviews the cost buildup (UC-301) and historical benchmark (UC-303). 6. Decision: Click "Approve". 7. Resolution: Quote button enabled; timestamped approval added to audit log (UC-902).


Versioning Use Cases

UC-401: Customer Requests Quantity Change

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Low
Actor: Estimator

Flow:

Step Action Result
1 Customer emails: "Please requote for 2000 pcs instead of 500" Request received
2 Estimator opens quote v1.0 Quote loaded
3 Clicks "Create New Version" Version dialog opens
4 Changes quantity: 500 → 2000 Recalculating...
5 System recalculates Setup costs amortized over 2000 pcs (lower per-piece)
Total cost per piece drops from ₹529 to ₹487
6 Estimator adds note: "Qty change: 500 → 2000 pcs" Note saved
7 Saves as v2.0 Version created
8 Generates new quote Quote ready

Key Insight: Batch economics automatically calculated


UC-402: Material Price Increase

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Admin

Scenario: Steel prices increased 12% across the board

Flow:

Step Action Impact
1 Admin updates Material Master:
SAE4140: ₹89.5/kg → ₹99.5/kg
Effective date: 2026-01-24
Rate updated
2 System flags 47 open quotes using SAE4140 Affected quotes identified
3 Admin selects "Bulk Update Affected Quotes" Batch process started
4 For each quote: Create new version (v1.1, v1.2, etc.)
Recalculate with new rate
Add note: "RM price update (12% increase)"
47 versions created
5 Estimators review and approve changes Changes reviewed
6 Updated quotes sent to customers Quotes sent

Governance: Price changes auditable, traceable to source


Output Use Cases

UC-501: Generate Standard Quote

Priority: P0 - Critical
Complexity: Medium
Actor: Estimator

Output Requirements: - Professional PDF for customer - Detailed Excel for internal review

PDF Quote Structure:

Section Content
Header Company Logo, Quote #Q-2026-0042, Date: 2026-01-24, Valid Until: 2026-02-24
Customer Info Customer: ABC Manufacturing
Part: Receiver Housing (Drawing #RH-2024-05)
Pricing Scenarios Base (25%): 1000 pcs @ ₹661.50 = ₹661,500
Aggressive (15%): 1000 pcs @ ₹608.00 = ₹608,000
Safe (35%): 1000 pcs @ ₹714.50 = ₹714,500
Terms Payment Terms: Net 30
Delivery: 6-8 weeks ARO
Tooling: Included in piece price
Technical Specs Material: SAE4140 Steel, 21mm diameter
Processes: Cut, Turn, Thread, Heat Treat, Coat
Quality: As per drawing specifications

Excel Breakdown Structure:

Sheet Content
Sheet 1: Summary Same as PDF
Sheet 2: Detailed Cost Breakdown Material costs
Each operation with time/rate
Tooling costs
Overheads
Scrap factors
Sheet 3: Assumptions & Notes Manual overrides with justifications
Critical assumptions
Customer-specific notes

UC-502: Quote for Tender Submission

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Low
Actor: Estimator

Scenario: Government tender requires specific format

Flow:

Step Action Output
1 Generate standard quote PDF + Excel created
2 Export cost data to tender template (Excel) Data exported
3 Fill required fields GST breakdown
Make in India certification
Delivery schedule
4 Upload to tender portal Submitted
5 Keep CostEngine version for future reference Version saved

Feature: Export to custom templates


Edge Cases & Error Handling

UC-601: Missing Critical Data

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Low
Actor: System

Scenario: Excel uploaded without material grade

Flow:

Step System Action User Action UI/UX Feedback
1 System detects missing material grade - Red Highlight on field B7 in the Excel preview table.
2 Halts import, shows error - Toast Notification: "Incomplete Data". A modal slides in showing the missing field.
3 - Estimator enters "SAE4140" Field turns from Red to White with a checkmark ✅.
4 Import resumes Click "Continue" Background processing indicator shown.

UC-602: Unrealistic Values

Priority: P1 - Important
Complexity: Medium
Actor: System

Scenario: Typo in Excel: Cycle time = 100 hours (should be 1.0)

Flow:

Step System Action Detection UI/UX Feedback
1 System calculates operation cost = ₹12,000 Calculation complete Total cost bar turns Orange (Suspicious value).
2 Validation rule triggers Cycle > 24 hrs Inline Warning Icon ⚠️ next to the Turning Cycle row.
3 Warning shown Popup triggered Tooltip: "Value is 10x higher than peer parts."
4 Estimator clicks "Fix" Value updated Value turns Green briefly to confirm change.
5 System recalculates Cost: ₹120/piece Dashboard totals update in real-time with smooth animation.

Safety: Catch data entry errors before bad quotes


UC-603: System-Wide UI Validation Patterns

Priority: P1 - Important
Category: UX/UI Hygiene

Standard system behaviors for input and feedback:

Scenario UI Pattern Behavior
Mandatory Field Asterisk (*) Field label includes a red asterisk. Submit is disabled until filled.
Logic Conflict Error Bar If Net Weight > Gross Weight, show a persistent red header: "Physical Inconsistency Detected."
Manual Override Yellow Highlight Any cell carrying a manual override must have a yellow background to distinguish from calculated values.
Unsaved Changes Form Guard Prompt "Unsaved Changes" if the user attempts to navigate away during an edit.
Calculation Delay Skeleton Load Show shimmering placeholder states if background calculations take > 200ms.

Integration Use Cases

UC-701: Sync with Tally ERP

Priority: P2 - Future
Complexity: High
Actor: Admin (scheduled job)

Flow:

Time Action Result
2:00 AM Nightly job runs Job started
2:01 AM System queries CostEngine for won quotes 12 won quotes found
2:02 AM For each won quote: Create customer order in Tally
Transfer BOM and quantities
Set pricing from quote
Orders created
2:05 AM System logs sync status Log updated
8:00 AM Morning report shows 12 quotes synced Report available

Integration Point: REST API to Tally


UC-702: Email Integration

Priority: P2 - Future
Complexity: Low
Actor: Estimator

Flow:

Step Action Pre-filled Data
1 Generate quote PDF PDF created
2 Click "Email Quote" Email compose opens
3 System pre-fills To: customer email (from RFQ)
Subject: "Quote #Q-2026-0042 for Receiver Housing"
Body: Professional template
Attachment: PDF + Excel
4 Estimator reviews and sends Email sent
5 System tracks "Quote sent on 2026-01-24 10:30 AM"

Technical Use Cases (Pipeline & Ops)

UC-801: Incremental Excel Sync

Actor: Background Job (Temporal/Node.js)

Ensures that large Excel files don't bog down the UI and that only changed data creates new database versions.

  1. Checksum Generation: System hashes the incoming Excel file/sheet.
  2. Comparison: Compares with the hash of the last v-current.
  3. Diff Engine: If hashes differ, identifies which specific rows (Operations) or clusters (Material) have changed.
  4. Async Load: UI shows "Importing in progress (75%)" while the background worker processes the diff.
  5. Completion: User receives a toast: "Sync complete. 2 Operations updated, Material cost unchanged."

UC-802: Automated Rate Lock

Actor: System

Ensures that once a quote is "Published", changing a global Raw Material rate doesn't break historical data.

  1. Publish Trigger: Estimator marks quote as "Final".
  2. Snapshot: System copies the current global Material Rate and MHR into the quote_item record.
  3. Decoupling: The quote now references its internal snapshot, not the global Master.
  4. Verification: Admin updates Steel Rate. Quote remains at the old rate unless the estimator explicitly chooses to "Upgrade Version".

UC-901: Database Failover Recovery

Actor: DevOps / Infrastructure

Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for when the primary database becomes unresponsive.

  1. Detection: Monitoring system triggers an alert (Avg Latency > 2s).
  2. Traffic Halt: Load balancer returns 503 "Maintenance Underway".
  3. Failover: Promote Read Replica to Primary status.
  4. Verification: Run SELECT count(*) FROM quotes to ensure zero data loss from the last 1-hour window (matching RPO).
  5. Recovery: Restore traffic and notify Admin of the failover event.

Actor: Admin

Tracking down "who changed what" when a customer disputes a quote from 6 months ago.

  1. Search Params: Admin enters part_number = "Y" and date range.
  2. Log Retrieval: System pulls all audit_logs where target_id matches the part.
  3. Timeline View: Displays a chronological list of:
    • [Jan 10]: User A changed MHR from 200 to 220.
    • [Jan 12]: User B overrode Steel Rate to 65.00 with reason "Special Supplier offer".
  4. Export: Admin exports this as a PDF "Traceability Report" to show the customer why the price changed mid-project.

UC-903: Containerized Deployment (Docker)

Actor: DevOps

Ensures the application runs identically in local dev, staging, and production environments.

  1. Containerization: Packaging of the FastAPI backend, Next.js frontend, and Celery workers into industry-standard Docker images.
  2. Orchestration: Use of docker-compose for local testing and Cloudflare/Cloud Run for production.
  3. Reproducibility: Ability to spin up a fresh testing environment in < 5 minutes for trial-run simulations.

UC-904: Centralized Observability & Logging

Actor: Admin / Developer

Consolidating logs from the API, Database, and Background workers into a single pane of glass.

  1. Unified Logging: Implementation of structured (JSON) logging across all microservices.
  2. Alerting: Integration with Sentry/ELK for high-severity error alerting.
  3. Telemetry: Tracking system health metrics (API latency, worker queue depth) to prevent downtime.

UC-905: MLOps Pipeline (Phase 3)

Actor: System / Data Science

Lifecycle management for the AI agents and Price Prediction models.

  1. Model Training: Automated retraining of RM rate forecasting models as new market data arrives.
  2. Version Control: Tracking which version of an LLM or Embedding model produced a specific agentic suggestion.
  3. Evaluation: Continuous monitoring of Agentic "Helpfulness" vs. Human overrides.

Use Case Testing Matrix

Use Case Manual Test Automated Test User Acceptance Priority
UC-001 Required E2E test 5 real RFQs P0
UC-002 Required Integration 3 rush scenarios P0
UC-101 Required Unit test 3 templates P0
UC-102 Required Unit test Error scenarios P1
UC-103 Required Manual Legacy formats P1
UC-201 Spot check Unit test N/A P0
UC-202 Spot check Unit test Multi-op routing P0
UC-203 Spot check Unit test Scrap scenarios P0
UC-301 Required Manual Customer demo P0
UC-302 Required Integration Version test P1
UC-401 Required Integration Qty changes P1
UC-402 Required Integration Bulk updates P1
UC-501 Required Output test Quote review P0
UC-502 Required Manual Tender format P1
UC-601 Required Unit test Missing data P1
UC-602 Required Unit test Validation P1
UC-701 Manual Integration ERP sync P2
UC-702 Required Integration Email send P2
UC-801 Required Pipeline test Sync logic P0
UC-802 Required Unit test Snapshot lock P1
UC-901 Manual Chaos Test Failover SOP P1
UC-902 Required Manual Forensic search P1
UC-903 Required Unit Test Docker Build P1
UC-904 Required Integration Sentry Logs P1
UC-905 Manual Sandbox Model Version P2